Native vs Hybrid vs Cross-Platform
Native Applications
Pros and Cons to Native Apps
Pros:
- Stores app resources in the mobile device’s memory, which maximizes OS features.
- The best tool to use for quality user experience and functionality.
- iPhone has many resources, reading materials and tools for developing native apps.
- Native apps have exclusive API’s that can access push notifications, in app purchases, and camera functionality that are usually prohibited in mobile web apps.
Cons:
- Native apps can get expensive especially if you want the app to be available cross platform.
- There are also slight variations with the UI on all the different platforms.
- It is very time consuming to create native applications for both Android and iOS, which can become very costly.
- Native applications usually have a requirement that only allows the app to define tablets and phones separately. This is non-transferrable between these two platforms.
Cross-Platform Applications
Pros and Cons to Cross-Platform Apps
Pros:
- Using cross-platform apps offers seamless functionality within the OS.
- It is easy to use code repeatability, hence offering cost-effective solutions to app development.
Cons:
- These apps often have a non-native feel to them, offering a less appealing user experience.
- There is also limited functionality to tap into.
Hybrid Application Development for Mobile Devices
The hybrid approach combines all the features of the app developments listed above. Native code is integrated with cross-platform using typical web technologies. These technologies include HTML, CSS and JavaScript. After the app is written, it is then bundled as a native application with an integrated web view. With the new frameworks such as React Native, the hybrid mobile app development approach can be delivered with much less effort while still achieving the same precision as the aforementioned development tools.
Pros and Cons of Hybrid Mobile Apps
Pros:
- With very little modification the same code can be used over different platforms.
- This in the long term will save money and time.
- The functionality of hybrid apps is very similar to native apps, making them very user friendly.
- The content is portable.
- Developers have an option to deliver the app locally or through a server, meaning the app can be accessed both offline and online.
Cons:
- Hybrid is a relatively new platform and may not work on all devices.
- There is not much support for these apps since they are so new, meaning problems can occur, and there is no troubleshooting available.
- If the app store you are using recognizes the app as a hybrid, it may be denied through the app store.
- Some vendors are now offering build platforms for these frameworks, meaning that you may have to pay for it.
The Verdict
There is no absolute choice for any of these options. It depends mostly on what is best for you or the company or venture being pursued. The best choice usually depends upon which requirements suit you best. If the application you are looking for is very complex in functionality, then native apps are the way to go. If an application that crosses multiple platforms is important, then choosing a cross-platform app is the better choice. If the budget is small and you are looking to optimize mobile experiences, then hybrid may be the way to go.
Cras chinwag brown bread Eaton cracking goal so I said a load of old tosh baking cakes, geeza arse it’s your round grub sloshed burke, my good sir chancer he legged it he lost his bottle pear shaped bugger all mate. The creators of the theme are happy with the response and have vowed to create further themes exploring the same concepts
